Important Decisions by Saanich Council and How They Impact You … (IMO)
Important Decisions by Saanich Council and How They Impact You … (IMO)
It is an honour to be celebrating six years as an elected official at the District of Saanich. It has become a regular practice for me to write to my constituents to inform, engage, and to inspire public participation. As your independent, 100% not-development-funded voice for a sustainable Saanich. I stand for transparency, accountability, and good governance. This includes informing the public about what is happening at Saanich Council in the absence of a voting dashboard.
Last term, when public participation was at its lowest because of the provincial health order, many of our foundational documents were changed via recommendations from the former mayor’s Standing Committee on Housing. These recommendations were approved by the majority of council.
Local Area Plans were suspended last term and this term they have been decoupled from the Official Community Plan, downgrading their status from bylaws to resolutions. The changes made to approved community plans during pandemic restrictions were intended to remove barriers to building affordable housing. However, these incentives did not result in any new affordable housing being built. Coincidentally, a new definition of affordable housing, unaffordable to a growing majority of residents, was proposed, and has been used in updating the Official Community Plan.
The Province has overridden local government’s authority on zoning. There are now areas legislated for upzoning and blanket rezoning, etc., and Official Community Plan-compliant development applications can be waived without a public hearing, even if they do not contain affordable housing. The public is banned from public hearings that are Official Community Plan-compliant.
Many of the changes mentioned above are resulting in rapid development, including an expedited Active Transportation Plan. They are also occurring at a time of reduced civic engagement with the banning of public from Official Community Plan-compliant hearings and removal of Open Forums.
Some of the residents just finding out about the changes that have occurred to our planning documents feel angry and frustrated, and many feel there is less opportunity to engage with Council. Saanich Council’s voting has also changed and is more prescribed, rather than being able to respect neighbourhood zoning issues. Some of my constituents feel unheard and want a platform through which to express their concerns and get answers. Fortunately, Council has added an opportunity for engagement through triannual Town Hall meetings.
So, for the record, I voted:
- NO to separating the Environmental Services and Planning Departments.
- NO to the suspension of Local Area Plans and decoupling them from the Official Community Plan.
- NO to delaying Development Cost Charges.
- NO to aligning our Official Community Plan documents with Bill 44, and I questioned the impacts of the province’s overtaking of municipal authority.
- NO to the new definition of affordability
- NO to the removal of the Open Forum.
- FOR implementing the Urban Forestry and Biodiversity Strategy.
- FOR retaining environmental protections on private property.
- FOR three annual Town Halls.
What is Happening At Saanich Council Meetings Fall Update
Will the Biodiversity Strategy and Urban Forest Strategy Save Nature in Saanich?
Dear Saanich Residents,
“Mother Nature and I are one, bonded by the morning sun.
Together, we walk down a green road, turn the corner and our hearts explode:
No vegetation to be seen and the land is left in a terrible scene.
This is where our paths depart, and it is here my duty starts.
Out of my bags, I pull my shovel, making an effort to repair the puzzle.
I am blessed by the mother. ”
This poem was written when I was 19 years old, and a tree planter, and we were working in MacKenzie B.C., in the interior of the province. MacKenzie is the home of the largest tree crusher in the world. It was used to steamroll trees growing in the valley bottoms of what became the Williston Reservoir after completion of the WAC Bennett Dam near Hudson’s Hope.
If you are lost and want to find yourself in the woods, going tree planting is a good thing for everyone to try, once. There are many parts of this story that I will leave out, like the part about missing the barge out because we were not finished planting and having to wait a week in a burned clear cut, with very limited supplies with crazy biting horse flies and no-see-ums. I had the experience of living on a burned and abused piece of land and witnessed the impacts it had on myself and the crew.
The poem refers to driving down tree-lined logging roads in the crummy (a converted truck used to transport tree planters) and turning the corner onto clear-cut, burned, moonscape as far as the eye could see.
This land was sick, devoid of vegetation, and most wildlife. Birds that were there seemed to be flying in circles with no place to go, looking for nests in trees that were no longer there.
This experience was like a record playing over for a few years in a loop, a short circuit. After promising myself I would never, never do that again, every spring I started to get the tree planter’s restless twinge.
I learned that tree planters suffer amnesia and forget the worst of it. The blisters, burns, bug bites, and vehicle breakdowns, and instead remember the great connections you make with strangers that become like family; you trust them with your life and share your deepest secrets. You eat good food, make money, and see the province.
The romantic version of doing fly-in contracts was soon replaced by the reality: we were not replacing forests; we were planting monocultures into ecosystems that had lost their biodiversity and keystone species and no longer functioned.
There was a lack of synergy between the aerobic and anaerobic interaction ecosystems generate.
My experiences as a tree planter were foundational and clearly defined and directed my life and studies.
The clear cuts I worked in evoked an emotional response inside me of deep despair. They were a horror of burned land and, in some cases, still smoking slash piles of burning logs, no wildlife. At the end of the day nostrils, the corners of your eyes, mouths, and bodies caked in a charred black tar.
This feeling of helplessness was compounded by the realization that in fact, I was not changing the world – I was part of the problem. By replanting trees, I was making the clear-cut logging industry seem sustainable.
Ecological restoration is instead about maintaining and restoring ecosystem function, keystone species, and sustainability. It is about finding opportunities to emulate nature.
My learning/education about the sacred ecology of these lands is derived from a my UVIC studies, First Nations studies, being a farmer in Saanich for more than 23 years practicing agroecology/ecological restoration and advocating for best practices in my job as a Saanich Councillor.
Regenerating ecosystems, propagating trees, creating and participating in land use practices that enhance biodiversity, create and extend biodiversity /wildlife corridors are personal actions that I take to alleviate my environmental concerns.
I became a politician to re-implement the biodiversity and urban forestry strategies.
It was supposed to take six months! Now, after seven years, they have both just been unanimously approved by council.
I should be very happy about this.
Before I continue, I want to emphasize that all my remarks are my own and are not a critique of staff. Council direct staff via our one employee, the CAO (Chief Administrative Officer).
Saanich Municipality has enjoyed a provincially renowned legacy of environmental protection (built on the exemplary works of Saanich Residents, staff, and former councils) and is known by the words Sustainable Saanich. However, because there has been an erosion of environmental protections over the last two terms, I have become increasingly concerned about our ability to maintain this status.
Most of these changes occurred when the public was out of the council chambers and were recommendations coming from the former mayor’s Standing Group On Housing. Many of these changes were also lobbied for by the development community and represent subsidies and reductions of community/public amenities. I was in opposition to all of these changes.
Here are some examples of the loss of environmental protections:
Last term the Environmental Services Department and Planning Department, once married together to symbolize our commitment to sustainable development and a common future, were separated. The small contingent of Environmental Services staff were diffused into the Parks Department, leaving the Planning Department without any staff to assess the environmental impacts of development applications on private land.
Last term the environmental protections on private property that had been in place since 2012 were rescinded.
The most recently adopted Official Community Plan did not contain the Biodiversity and Urban Forestry Strategies.
The just-approved Biodiversity Strategy and Urban Forestry Strategy are poorly funded and there is no long-term guarantee they will be fully implemented.
Local Area Plans, which contain specialized neighborhood approved plans and environmental policies, were decoupled from the new Official Community Plan. This undermines 100+ years of civic engagement because Official Community Plans are legally binding, and the formerly integrated Local Area Plans were enforceable bylaws. Local Area Plans have now effectively been downgraded to resolutions.
This term, the provincial government took over municipal government zoning and cemented in that there was no environmental protection on private property. This means that up to 90% of Saanich private property does not have any environmental protection.
Approximately 4,610 homes have been targeted in Saanich by the Province’s housing goals. A majority of Saanich council voted to not only meet these targets but to exceed them. Single-family lots can now have 4-6 homes, or a 3-story building, or even up to 26 stories inside the Urban Containment Boundary.
More than 500,000 trees within the Urban Containment Boundary are at risk of being cut because of the Province’s housing targets. The just-approved Urban Forestry Strategy is about removing trees and replacing them over 40 years. This means we could lose 538,000 trees within the Urban Containment Boundary in the immediate future and slowly replace them over four decades.
Lands outside the Urban Containment Boundary are not exempt from the Province’s Bill 44, 46, 46, despite a unanimously voted motion from Saanich Municipality to exclude them.
Because housing is how Saanich derives approximately 77% of its tax revenue, the incentive to build is intense. Provincial lobbying and Saanich council lobbying when the public was out of the chambers during COVID played a significant role in determining these housing targets. The public were locked out, but the development community remained and were still making recommendations – recommendations that were adopted by a majority of council when public participation was at its lowest.
It is, in my opinion, impossible to have sustainable land use without environmental protection during development. Approximately 90% of the imperiled Coastal Douglas-Fir ecosystem persists on private property. Transferring carbon sinks, wetlands, sensitive ecosystems for endangered species, and natural areas into paved, impervious surfaces is not sustainable.
Saanich residents all live in a nationally renowned biodiversity hotspot. Transferring 14,000 years of culturally derived biodiversity based on the land use practices of the Coast Salish Peoples into pipes and pavement is a massive loss and, in the end, does not truly address the housing affordability crisis.
The corporate, anthropocentric worldview that sees the highest and best use of ecosystems as housing developments needs to change and start considering other species beyond humans.
Yours in conservation
Natalie Chambers
What is happening at Saanich Council Meetings?
Dear Saanich Residents,
Last night at Saanich Council, “Public Forum,” ‘another brick in the wall,’ was dismantled from Saanich’s foundation and legacy of civic engagement.
Although the opportunity for semi-annual public town hall meetings was added (council amended to 3), it did not have to come at a loss for the public forum. 5/3 Vote.
Councilor Chambers and 2 other councilors voted to retain public forum
At first, these votes were bundled together, which felt like the council was being forced into a corner and had to vote to remove the public forum if they wanted to get town hall meetings. I communicated about this, and others did, too. As a result, the votes were separated. So council had a choice to vote for both opportunities. The public could have had their cake and eaten it, too, for once.
In the newspaper today, I would be willing to bet that adding Town hall meetings will take the front stage, and there will be no mention of losing public forum.
Town hall meetings are a great addition to public participation, which I have advocated since I was elected, and it was a strategic initiative of the council.
Many bricks have fallen from the foundation and legacy of civic engagement; some were forced, some were surrendered, and in some cases, the mortar was mixed last term.
I see why many members of the public are frustrated, do not feel heard, may perhaps feel they have wasted their time engaging and are angry about being banned from public hearings on zoning (Bill 44). The public forum has been removed from the committee of the whole meetings (COW). I am listening. I agree with you that democracy at all levels of government is declining.
We must fight for democracy!
Last term, the local area plans were suspended (development community recommendations), and this term, they were decoupled (cut out) from the Saanich Official Community Plan (OCP ); they have lost their status as enforceable bylaws, protecting what the community deemed important.
The local area plans (LAPs) have lost their teeth and are now just gums and stand as resolutions, which have been adopted by minutes. As a founding member of the Blenkinsop Valley Community Assn. 2006 and director for many years I intimately know how important these are and advocated with the public for them to be updated.
Then there is the fact that many of our strategies have been superceeded (approved community plans, paid for by residents and have been set aside) and some members of the public feel their wasted. This was really apparent last night with the updates the Shelbourne Valley Plan that I was compelled vote in opposition to. Also my reasons were (consideration of the Bowker, urban forestry and biodiversity strategy should of course e before the plan, not an after thought. The OCP was published ahead of the biodiversity and urban forestry strategies. It does not include those. Although the committee I chair the Climate Action Advisory (CAA) made recommendations to regularly update the OCP so those can be added it has not occurred yet.
Nathalie Chambers
Fall 2024 Update
Fall Update:
I hope this email finds you and your family well. Fall is upon us, and hope that you had the chance to enjoy a nature-filled summer in this beautiful municipality we call home.
Thank you, especially to all the stewards of Saanich, for your work.
I am your Independent, 100% not development-funded voice for a sustainable Saanich. I have never worked harder for people, planet, and place over profit. I stand for transparency, accountability, and good governance. This includes informing the public about the changes to our foundational documents and providing regular updates in the absence of a voting dashboard or lobby register.
Local government used to be the most important level of government for affordable housing and environmental sustainability via zoning. Zoning was our magic wand. In an unprecedented move, representing perhaps the biggest provincial download onto municipal government and local taxpayers, the province took over the municipal authority on zoning. In other words, they put us on the naughty list and took away our magic wands. This included banning public hearings on subdivisions and zoning applications.
It has changed our role as municipal councillors. Our votes are prescriptive, we can no longer represent Saanich residents on neighborhood zoning matters. Residents are consulted and informed by website and emails.
Here is a link to my last communication, which delves deeper into this issue:
Since my last communication, which informed residents about the opportunity to provide input on the new Official Community Plan (OCP), and attending the last public hearing on zoning, the new OCP has passed. The new OCP has incorporated the new definition of affordability into it (I voted against this definition) and the Local Area Plans (LAPs) have been decoupled from the OCP.
I am a long-time defender of the LAPS and voted against their suspension last term and voted against their decoupling from the new OCP this term.
Removing the LAP’S from the OCP has downgraded their legal status as enforceable bylaws to resolutions. The Local Area Plans represent 100+ years of civic engagement and were foundational to the District of Saanich. They contained the approved community plans and vision for a sustainable future for Saanich.
In 2018, many of us heard the importance of updating the LAP’S at the doorstep when door knocking. The ink was not even dry on the strategic plan when the former Mayor’s Housing Group recommended their suspension, and, one term later, they are now decoupled from the OCP. The new OCP was passed without the Biodiversity Strategy and Urban Forestry Strategy included. The committee that I chair, the Climate Action Advisory Committee, made recommendations for regular OCP updates so that, when the Biodiversity Strategy and Urban Forestry Strategy were completed, they could be added.
The Urban Forestry Strategy and the Biodiversity Strategy have just been unanimously approved by council. Despite missing a stewardship program and other gaps, this is very good news. These are two components of our larger strategy on biodiversity conservation and sustainability, which will also include Natural Assets and Regional Watersheds. Both the Urban Forestry Strategy and the Biodiversity Strategy will be implemented over 10 years. However, neither of these strategies have been funded yet in the 2025 budget. They are labeled as strategic initiatives and funding is not guaranteed.
Post–COVID, civic engagement has changed from being input-driven to the public being informed and consulted via email or the website. Council’s votes are now prescriptive and we are unable to represent the public on zoning matters. I hear many residents say they feel underrepresented and there are fewer and fewer opportunities for public engagement. The public feel democracy and public participation is at risk.
The provincial Bill 44, 46, 47 have made historic financial downloads on local government with losses to public participation and neighborhood representation, and impacts to safety, deficiencies in infrastructure, and impacting public amenities.
The latest challenge we face is potentially removing the Public Forum and replacing it with bi-annual Town Hall meetings.
This Public Forum item is on the September 23, 2024 agenda. Thankfully, our corporate officer has now separated the motions, so if council wishes they can vote for both. For once, the public could potentially have their cake and eat it too.
In conclusion, local government tax increases, decreasing environmental protections, ignoring Saanich’s foundational planning documents and decoupling LAPs from the OCP, and banning public hearings are all items to keep in mind for this provincial election.
It’s mid-term and I want to hear from you!
Sincerely yours,
Councillor Nathalie Chambers
Who will write the future of Saanich? Premier Eby.
Who will write the future of Saanich?
Premier David Eby
The deleterious impacts of Bill 44, that was rushed through Royal Assent without debate on Nov 30th, will outlast his premiership by decades.
Bill 44 requires all municipalities (pop. 5000+) to increase density on lots currently zoned for single family homes or duplexes to 4 or 6 units per lot.
It eliminates public hearings on development applications that “meet” the guidelines of the Official Community Plan (OCP).
Our Official Community Plan is not designed for this.
Whether or not a community has adequate infrastructure – fire service, sewage systems, electricity – this no longer factors into this decision making. The costs will be borne by the taxpayer, not the developer. Parking congestion in your neighborhood? Bill 44 prohibits municipalities from requiring off-street parking and loading spaces in relation to residential use, with few stipulations. Trees are going to come down – everywhere.
Saanich’s environmental protections have been stripped**.
The language in our OCP is indefensible:
Encourage the retention or planting
of native vegetation in the coastal
riparian zone
Incorporate and retain high value
trees where possible
Support the protection of significant
public view corridors where identified
through detailed planning.
Our OCP was written in 2008.
In December 2023 Saanich adapted the plan – The Redline OCP is available here:
Despite the fact that this needs to be adopted before June, no date has been set for public hearing on the adoption of this plan.
Pay attention. This density increase is applied across BC.
There is no stipulation that the resulting properties are affordable.
It is applied to our shoreline properties.
One can preview the aggressiveness of the Provincial authority enacted by Bill 44 by reviewing the “Small-Scale, Multi-Unit Housing Provincial Policy Manual & Site Standards” published March 14th, 2024. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/
In areas where six units are permissible the “recommended benchmark regulation” for maximum lot coverage is 60-70%.
The influence of the Province’s drive for accelerated development is already upon Saanich. See our recent development approval (February 26th), 4590 Lochside Drive, for an example of what to expect.
PLEASE COMMIT TO ATTENDING UPCOMING HEARINGS FOR OUR OCP
Sign up to Saanich’s email list to stay informed about the Strategic OCP Update: https://secure.campaigner.com/
5G Tower on PKOLS?!? – speak out!
BC Town Halls 2024
Public Process and People, Pets and Parks Strategy Outcomes
Dear Residents of Saanich, especially those who took time to participate in the People, Pets and Parks engagement,
It has become such a contentious and divisive issue that I wish to clarify why I voted in opposition to the bylaw amendments for Saanich’s People Pets and Parks (PPP) Strategy. It is because the revised bylaw amendments resulted in a reduction of environmental protection in our ecologically sensitive natural areas. My election platform rests well on representing those who uphold environmental values and protections in Saanich.
Our relationship with the First Nations, including the W̱SÁNEĆ and Lək̓ʷəŋən people is also very important to me is. This letter, sent to all of Council in June, was confirmed in September to be the position of the WSANEC Leadership Council:
“The WSANEC Leadership Council is concerned about the degradation of ecologically sensitive areas of PKOLS, caused by off leash dog walking and off trail use by dogs in these native ecosystems. We are aware that this is a significant concern. PKOLS is an extremely important location in the history of the WSANEC Nation. We fully support the District of Saanich’s Pet Strategy that requires dogs to be on leash in natural parks that have ecologically sensitive areas.”
Saanich’s PPP process was conducted fairly and thoroughly with multiple inputs, including many community engagement opportunities, and resulted in a comprehensive set of recommendations that represented a balance of interests amongst dog owners (both those who use leashes and those who oppose leashes), non-dog owners and environmental protection. I, along with my colleagues on Council, unanimously approved the PPP recommendations on June 28, including an amendment to the motion, seconded by myself, stating “and this work will be done in consultation with the W̱SÁNEĆ Leadership Council”.
Council’s approval of these bylaw amendments, which directly reflected the PPP Strategy recommendations we had unanimously approved in June, should have been a simple procedural exercise. The residents of Saanich were not aware that further public input was necessary. Both I and the residents of Saanich expected the amendments to receive three readings when they were brought to Council on September 11. Unfortunately I was unable to participate in this meeting due an urgent personal matter. Had I been there I would have seconded the motion for first reading and the outcome today might have been very different. Instead, Council chose to pause the decision for two weeks, allowing an opportunity for further lobbying of some of my colleagues.
Unfortunately, a vocal minority of off-leash advocates continued to lobby Council to change the PPP bylaw amendments. There was targeted lobbying of some members of Council, including meetings and correspondence not shared with all of Council.
On September 25, I voted in opposition to a series of alternative bylaw amendments that were not supported by the PPP Strategy recommendations Council had approved and had no opportunity for public input. These amendments have now received final reading, supported by a majority of Council.
Some members of the public felt let down by Council’s decision and some members of Council felt there needed to be an element of compromise. But I believe that we had arrived at our agreed upon compromise in June. The entire PPP strategy that we unanimously approved in June was the result of a well-balanced process engaging different sides of the issue. I feel what we have compromised is the integrity of the process and the outcomes for environmental protections in parks and beaches in Saanich.
I am deeply saddened to say that the decision of Council has eroded the trust of our residents. Regardless of their position on the issue of dogs in parks, residents of Saanich should be asking themselves if this is how they wish to see their elected leaders making decisions on their behalf.
Saanich Councillor Nathalie Chambers
For those that want to view Saanich Council in action
COUNCIL MEETING September 25, 2023
Video – https://saanich.ca.granicus.com/player/clip/790?view_id=1&redirect=true&h=6048dbfa5885343f10d1b2eea43c43d0 NC comments at 1:17 to 1:21
COUNCIL MEETING October 30, 2023
No minutes are available yet